Tarantino HATEFUL EIGHT 70mm Road Trip Review

hateful_eight_ver11_xlg

Quentin Tarantino can be a bit of a provocateur, which I don’t think is a bad thing, but can be off-putting to some, but he is also a great filmmaker.

He is a visionary in the best sense of that word. And there is always a battle between the provocateur aspect to his nature and the filmmaker, and depending on the successfulness of that mixture, will in large part determine whether his film falls on the good or the great scale.

In the HATEFUL EIGHT, I think he gets that mixture right in a way that rockets it right up there, with his best films.

I saw this movie the day after seeing STAR WARS THE FORCE AWAKENS, an impressively written and directed effort by any standards, and while I found it a very good film, HATEFUL EIGHT 70mm Road-Trip Edition felt a great film.

Now visually the STAR WARS film, seen at one of the few IMAX Laser 3D theaters, was the more impressive viewing experience.  The theater I saw the HATEFUL EIGHT in, THE AFI at SILVER SPRING, was a very good theater, and shown in 70 mm, however outside of the increased breadth of the picture I could not tell this was a 70mm film.

Part of this I want to chalk up to being too far from the screen, or the screen not large enough to really dominate the room, it was a big room, but ultimately a well designed movie theater should give you a great picture from any room in the theater, the back of the theater or the front.

I felt the Airbus IMAX Theater in Chantilly Virginia got this RIGHT, and not so much the theater I saw the HATEFUL EIGHT in. Again I don’t think the film projected bad, it looked great in fact, however as someone who has seen LAWRENCE OF ARABIA reissued in 70mm, that is the rich, flooded detail and sensory overload i was expecting. None of that was present here in the HATEFUL EIGHT.

aside from it being a wider picture, I could not tell it wasn’t just typical 35mm, stretched a bit.  I know Quentin and the Weinstein’s retrofitted some theaters to showcase the film in 70mm, unfortunately at the theater I was in they either didn’t test or care how the movie presented to those in the more distant seats.

Is it a 70mm experience from the worst seat in the house? If the answer is no, then you need to do something.

hateful_eight_ver10_xlg

 

That criticism however is not on Tarantino, but rather the individual theater owners to insure they are providing the spectacle they are advertising.

I really enjoyed the HATEFUL EIGHT, but it’s 70mm nature, was unfortunately undetectable.  I would have loved to see this film at someplace like the Airbus to see if it’s 70mm nature came across. BEcause i wholeheartedly support tarantino’s push to make 70mm relevant in an age of digital.  I just think we need to do a little more quality control at the individual theaters to ensure viewers are getting that 70mm experience.

But enough about the film stock and visuals, what about the sound?

From Ennio Morricone’s first score for a western in decades, I was of course expecting something good, what we got was great. That score is magnificent, the work of a genius, undimmed by age.

I, in the theater, knew I wanted to purchase that score. That rarely happens to me.

 

hateful_eight_ver2_xlg

 

The same can be said of Tarantino’s film in total. HATEFUL EIGHT is an experience, a sometimes uncomfortable, and ugly experience, (man do they say the N word a lot) but without doubt a captivating, and memorable experience. You want to be in this place, with these dire and dangerous people, these ‘HATEFUL EIGHT ‘, to see where the road leads them.

Being a Western, that most iconic and cemented of genres, you know if not when the road will end, that blood will be waiting there at that end.

And there is blood, in extraordinary quantities, at the end of THE HATEFUL EIGHT. But there is more, there is pathos, and regret, and humor, and insight.

Tarantino is not afraid to probe the unexamined questions and uncrossed divide of race and class in our past and our present, our peers and ourselves, but to always do it without losing the narrative purpose, without losing the ability to entertain, is a tricky tightrope to walk.

For a film to be both important and fun to watch is a rare beast, and one the Academy is reluctant to nominate, but HATEFUL EIGHT is such a beast.

I watched the closing credits come across with that wonderful final song, and I thought there at the end of the movie, what I thought during the movie… this is a masterpiece.
Grade: A-.

 

 

hateful_eight

15 Favorite Pulp Heroes / Characters and the meaning of Pulp! Pt. 1 of 2!


Price The Avenger Chronicles Here!

We’ll begin this with a definition of pulp, pulp heroes, and pulp writing, then get into my list of favorite pulp characters and pulp runs.

The perceived definition of a pulp character tends to be a character that takes place in the 20s to 40s, in an America besieged by the spectre of War, and consists of slam-bam action, and a colorful larger than life hero and outlandish villains.

It’s with the cementing of pulp heroes to a specific milieu, a specific time, that I take issue with that definition. Characters such as THE SHADOW and DOC SAVAGE and the AVENGER were pulp sensations AT THE TIME OF THEIR PUBLICATION because they spoke to present fears and issues, in colorful imaginative ways.

But now the nostalgia bunch wants to calcify the definition of pulp adventure to a particular time frame or particular writers. I don’t think pulp heroes need to be set 80 or a 100 years in the past, that’s not what Marcel Allain, Norvell Page or Walter Gibson or Paul Ernst (writing as Kenneth Robeson) or any of the pulp writers we idolize today, were doing.

Now I’m not saying ignore the pulp heroes of yesterday, or not set new pulp stories in the 20s or 30s if you want. But what I am saying is… you’re largely missing the point of what the pulp writers were really doing. They were putting these heroes in a world that really needed them, the present world.

I am saying the pulp fiction of Warren Murphy’s REMO WILLIAMS or Marc Olden’s BLACK SAMURAI or Don Pendleton’s MAC BOLDEN are far truer representations of pulp fiction, pulp heroes, than today’s current writers who are making nostalgic re-workings of 1920s, 1930, and 1940s stories.

Again I have no problem with modern writers setting stories in that time frame, I quite enjoy and have championed many of them, but there seems to be this faulty conclusion in the minds of modern writers and readers that setting them in a specific past time frame, makes it pulp. No. Nothing could be further from the truth. Setting it in that time frame makes it a pastiche.

If Gibson or Page or Allain were writing today their heroes would be set in today, and their horror and villains… expressions of timely concerns. Allain’s FANTOMAS or Gibson’s SHADOW would be hanging the president of Exxon or Shell out of a window, saying “You want to explain those gas prices to me now?”

That’s why I love books like BLACK SAMURAI and THE DESTROYER because they are the pulp aesthetic continued, and have original things to say and original menaces to say it to, rather than simply the tendency to nostalgia, and aping dead writers.

When pulp heroes of yesterday fought nazis and gangsters, that wasn’t simply kitschy entertainment, that took some balls. Because gangsters were very much real things, and Nazis a very real threat, and nobody wanted to touch these topics. The way no one today wants to deal with topics of Guantanamo Bay, or Middle Eastern massacres, or corporate over-lobbying of representatives.

Pulp fiction of the 10s (the wonderful, and horrifying Fantamos),20s and 30s and 40s… was timely and controversial. Pulp fiction (and pulp heroes) was about giving the common man a hero who could stand up against the evils of the day, be those evils foreign or domestic. That is pulp fiction, not this nostalgic, safe, hermetically sealed, removed from any relevance of today, pastiches that people want to sanctify.

True pulp fiction, is a fantastic, white-knuckled, adrenalin inducing and entertaining tirade against the evils of its time. Sometimes in-dispute evil.

People forget there was a portion of America, the loud vocal right wing that were pro-hitler and pro the nazis, right up to and even after Pearl Harbor. So for these books to come out in the 1930s with Nazi Villains took balls. It was controversial. They got their share of grief from the Rush Limbaugh’s of the day.

So when people say “Well, true pulp fiction/pulp heroes needs to be set in the 20s to the 40s”, to that I say “only if you’re living in the 20s to the 40s”. True pulp heroes are an answer… an answer to the truths and the lies of your nightly news.

So while it’s wonderful we have this resurgence of so many writers doing pastiches in the pulp vein, it’s unfortunate so few modern writers are actually doing real pulp novels ala Warren Murphy or the late Marc Olden or even the late Ian Flaming.

So few current writers are doing books with great, even salacious covers, breakneck speed, thrilling action, and larger than life protagonists in conflict with outlandish villains, set in a present/timely context. That is the definition of true pulp fiction, and true pulp heroes… and what we are in dire need… of more of.

-to be continued-

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Part II will bring you the list of 15 favorite pulp heroes. Your jaw will drop!!! 🙂

Copyright 2000-2012 Masai Inc

Rudolph Fisher, Len Zinberg, Ed Lacy’s Toussaint Moore and ‘credible’ Black Detectives

Ed Lacy was the pseudonym for Leonard S. Zinberg, a writer with a prolific career from the 1930s through to the 1960s. His moniker of Ed Lacy was picked up in the wake of his return from World War II, and most mentions of this writer take into account only his post 1950s ‘Ed Lacy’ titled work, ignoring quite an abundant career under his own and at least one other pseudonym.

For the sake of this article we’ll use the names Lacy/Zinberg interchangeably to discuss all his work. Because the same thread of conscience and passions are in his work throughout his career, and throughout his pseudonyms.

What separates Leonard (Len) Zinberg’s pulp fiction is his social conscience. A lifelong jazz lover, humanist, activist, and socialist, in addition to just thrilling fiction he also wrote on the social injustices of the day, even decades prior to donning the Ed Lacy moniker. His explosion on the pulp/mystery scene was an outgrowth of returning from the war to an America and a world, forever changed by atrocities human and atomic, and his need to support his family.

Being in a mixed marriage, a lover of Harlem night life, and a fixture of the music, literary and boxing scenes there, Zinberg’s mystery novels had an authenticity that many lacked. Like Chester Himes, he could speak on more than the tropes of the private eye medium, but use the medium to touch on larger insightful and incisive examinations of America.

In addition Leonard’s work was respected by some of the standout writers of the day, including voices as august as Ralph Ellison, who saw in Leonard’s writing someone with keen insight into the conditions and quality of Black life in America.

This is what Ralph Ellison had to say in 1940 about Leonard’s first novel WALK HARD, TALK LOUD-

“For several years Len Zinberg, a young white writer, has been producing short stories that reveals an acute and sympathetic interest in the Negro’s problems. In his first novel, WALK HARD, TALK LOUD Mr. Zinberg tells the story of a Negro Prize fighter. The writer is far more successful than most writers who approach Negro life from the outside, even those who command more art (Ernest Hemingway, for example, from whom Zinberg has learned much)…WALK HARD, TALK LOUD is an exciting first novel with plenty of action and suspense. Len Zinberg indicates how far a writer, whose approach to Negro life is uncolored by condescension, stereotyped ideas, and other faults growing out of race prejudice, is able to go with a Marxist understanding of the economic basis of Negro personality. That plus a Marxist sense of humanity, carries the writer a long way in a task considered extremely difficult: for a white writer to successfully depict Negro character.”
—Ralph Ellison, New Masses 17 Dec 1940

A prolific writer Leonard wrote numerous novels and hundreds of articles and short stories, however Zinberg is one of many writers whose work has all but been scratched from history, due in part to his socialist ties. A victim of the age of the red scare, his work has been little adapted, and has been largely out of print for decades. Though the rise of Ebooks are allowing this author and his body of work to start to reach a new generation, in an affordable manner.

Indeed to illustrate his new visibility, it’s become commonplace on the Internet to credit Ed Lacy with writing the ‘first credible Black PI’ for his Toussaint M. Moore character that appeared in 1957s ROOM TO SWING.

The only problem with that assertion is… it’s incorrect.

People online simply parroting an uninformed comment posted first, seemingly, on the MysteryFile website, and picked up by those who are perhaps a bit too lazy or too unprofessional to do due diligence to verify their borrowed ‘truths’.

Here’s the thing ‘First credible Black PI’? What exactly is that supposed to mean? Lacy/Zinberg didn’t create the first Black PI, credible or otherwise. Credible, seemingly code for ‘it was created by a White person’.

Being a bit facetious there, but the point is there were quite a few Black PI characters, by Black writers prior to Zinberg’s addition to the field..

Most notably Rudolph Fisher’s character of Dr. John Archer appearing in 1932s THE CONJURE MAN DIES:A MYSTERY TALE OF DARK HARLEM, which given Leonard’s interests he was probably very familiar with, and a fan of, before embarking on his own writing career.(no doubt not ‘credible’ because Archer in addition to solving crimes in his off time, is a Doctor? Hate to break it to you… you being the ‘credible’ crowd, but the Black gentleman who wrote the character of Dr. Archer was in addition to being a writer, also a Radiologist, and a Musician. He was if anything, more extraordinary than his fictions)

Rudolph Fisher, who’ll I’ll be doing an upcoming post on, was a true renaissance man, in his short life. The 1920s seeing the blooming of many a brilliant man of color, and Rudolph Fisher, a guiding light of the Harlem Renaissance, was certainly one of the pivotal figures of the 20s and early 30s.

So I just wanted to clear up that ‘credible PI’ comment. Which is really just denigrating double-speak for, ‘we’re going to give you (Zinberg- a socialist we don’t like anyhow) a backhanded compliment, and at the same time disparage Black writers who came before you because, they are Black and we don’t think anything they write is credible”, it’s just a staggeringly brain-dead comment, that insults Zinberg and writers as varied and acclaimed as Rudolph Fisher.

Preserve us from moronic catchphrases taken up by parrots; I’m reminded of the catchphrase ‘refugees’ that was on every newscasters teleprompter during Katrina. It just shows that we are perhaps more a propaganda nation, in line with Germany of the 30s, then we choose to recognize or admit. The bane and death of a free society, being a compromised mass media.

Okay, having taken umbrage with that comment and shot it in the heart, as it so richly deserves, let’s get back to Zinberg proper. By all means read the works of Leonard Zinberg/Ed Lacy and enjoy them, there is much to enjoy and he deserves to be rediscovered. But he deserves discovery not for the bs reasons the lazy and bigoted try to coin, but for the real reasons of he was a gifted writer, with a real social conscience, and something to say about folly and fools.

And surviving them.

Here’s an excerpt from his 1957 Edgar Award Winning novel ROOM TO SWING:

1
I BROKE par in Bingston. It’s a little town of a couple of thousand in southern Ohio and you can take in the entire town in about three minutes. It took me less than a minute to learn all I wanted to know—that I’d made a mistake coming here.

The main drag looks bigger than it should because they get a lot of trade from nearby farms. I parked my car in front of the largest store—a drugstore—and went in. The few people passing stared at me like I’d stepped out of a flying saucer. Okay, even though my Jaguar is an eight-year-old job I picked up for six hundred bucks, any foreign heap attracts attention. A fact which was worrying me nuts at the moment; attention was the last thing I needed.

I was a positive sensation inside the store—everything stopped dead still. The fat soda jerk stared at me with disbelief, a guy having breakfast at the counter spun around, toast in mouth, and made big eyes, the druggist was getting some mail from an old Negro postman and they both looked startled. It was a well-stocked place, more like a general store. I saw the phone booths and walked over. The Bingston phone book is about the size and thickness of a Broadway theater program. There wasn’t any May Russell listed.

Figuring there had to be more to the phone book than this booklet, I started toward the soda jerk to ask. He reacted like a ham actor, his round face showing horror, then a fat grin of relief as he glanced at the door. I turned to see a cop coming at me, coming fast. Some small-town cops sport musical-comedy uniforms. This one was a stocky, middle-aged joker in high-polished black boots, gray breeches with a wide purple stripe down the sides, leather wind-breaker with the largest badge I ever saw, and a kind of cowboy hat. There wasn’t any doubt as to why he was coming; his gun was loose in its holster and he was actually holding a billy in his right hand. I didn’t see how they could be looking for me so soon, but my stomach began turning somersaults. I got set; if I could flatten this cop and make the door I was safe.

The mailman was suddenly in my way, both hands on my right fist as he whispered, “Relax, son.”
“Get out of my face!” I said, pulling my hand away. The cop was on top of us. The mailman nodded at him and said, “Hello, Mr. Williams.”

“Hello, Sam. Anything for me?”
“I left a few letters at your office,” the postman said, still blocking me.
The cop asked me, “Stranger in town, boy?”
“Yeah.” I’d been called boy more times in the last half a dozen hours than in my whole life.
“That’s what I thought. I’d better explain a few things to you.”

“What things?” I said, my eyes on his billy hand. I pushed the mailman out of the way but the damn fool stepped right back in front of me.

“What you doing here, boy?”

“Looking in the phone book. That against the law?”

“Nope. I thought maybe you was thinking of eating in here. Being new, maybe you don’t know it ain’t the custom for colored to eat in here.”

I got a little mad and I relaxed, almost sagged with relief. I was still in the clear. The crazy thing that stuck in my mind was that this cop had a kind face, and if anything, he was talking very gently —with the billy ready for action. I told him, “I wasn’t planning on eating the phone book.”

— ROOM TO SWING by Len Zinberg (witing as Ed Lacy) 1957
Room To Swing: Only a Few Copies left in stock. Price your copy here!

It’s a good place to start, but definitely don’t neglect Zinberg’s other work, including his pre-war time stories and novel.

Recommended Links: Paula Woods, Dwayne Swierczynski, Cornell Woolrich, Charlie Huston

Here it is.

Sure sign of the apocalypse… a blogger recommending other bloggers and related pop-culture sites.

But seriously my bookmarks tend to get very bloated over time, so this exercise is more than anything to help me define what sites I should keep, and that I need to visit more routinely. And if in addition to that stated purpose; this overview also comes as handy and helpful guide to one of you reading this… then so much the better.

Okay onto it:

sdbheader3SECRET DEAD BLOG– I have only read one thing by writer Duane Swierczynski, and that was his MOON KNIGHT annual of a year or so ago. What I read impressed me, and as his blog shows he has impeccable taste in all things pulp and horror, I try to remember to peek in on his site occasionally. Good stuff. Of his books, I think I’ll give his WHEEL MAN, THE CRIMES OF DR. WATSON INTERACTIVE BOOK, and MURDER AT WAYNE MANOR INTERACTIVE BOOK a try wheelman011007drwatson(I was a fan of those choose your own adventure books as a kid. So these sound like they would make good presents for nieces and nephews. I’ll have to read them and confirm they are age appropriate). But with a stack of books that includes 4 Chester Himes books, 12 Cornell Woolrich, 3 Charlie Huston, 1 Walter Mosley and my usual mountainous stack of comics and magazines…it may be a bit before I get to WHEEL MAN. We’ll see.

THRILLING DETECTIVE– This site covering all things noirish, hard boiled, and pulp-fiction inspired has for about ten years been a regular member of my bookmark lists. It is just a staggering and valuable resource for all mystery fans out there, whether your particular poison be radio, movies, tv, comics or dare I say it… novels. And with their extensive link section it really is your one stop shop for anything mystery related. Highly Recommended!

Hard-Boiled Forum recommendationsThis is actually an old Bulletin Board thread, but has some really nifty recommendations for Hard-Boiled books and films. I’ve tried a sizable # of the recommendations.

bestcwjapanWoolrich TimelineI consider Cornell Woolrich to be one of the most phenomenal writers of the 20th century, his writing style transcends what he writes about, or transforms it… so that acts of murder or the mundane become instead, in his words, dizzying moments of grace, or alien acts of birth. He is the pragmatist as romantic, and thankfully his output (writing under 3 different names) was nothing short of staggering. And he was one of the few writers who was as good at the novel as he was with the short story, which gives me quite a body of work to sample. I find this page very helpful in determining the chronology of Woolrich, and therefore the next Woolrich story to go hunting for. rendbal

SAVAGE CRITIC Blog– You know when I’m looking for comic reviews, I’m not looking for long, spoiler filled dissections. Keep it short, keep it simple, tell me if the book was bad, good, or great; and a general idea why. This site run by Uber-Retailer Brian Hibbs, does just that. Arguably the best review site on the web, easily the most navigable. No Flash, No Javascript… just getting to the point.

spooks_spies_mimg Paula Woods is a reviewer/editor turned acclaimed mystery writer. A few years ago (wait… has it really been 13 years?!), Paula Woods put together one of my favorite anthologies in 1995’s SPOOKS,SPIES, AND PRIVATE EYES: BLACK MYSTERY, CRIME, AND SUSPENSE FICTION OF THE 20TH CENTURY. Along with Harlan Ellison’s DANGEROUS VISIONS it’s one of the best anthologies I’ve come across, and long overdue. Long out of print it’s a title I always pick up copies of, when I come across them, usually to hand out as gifts. Both historically relevant, as well as plain intriguing you might find it an equally compelling gift for the Mystery Lover in your life. Highly Recommended!

Fascinating article on the surge in Black Mystery writers.

Interesting Writers conference happening next year

caughtstealingsmallAnd let me just wrap this surprisingly time consuming post up, with a recommendation on what I’m reading right now. I’m 59 pages into Charlie Huston’s first novel CAUGHT STEALING. In a word… phenomenal. Terse, effective, almost stream of consciousness in how information is presented, 1st person narrative, that toys with time and perspective, to gripping effect. So far CAUGHT STEALING is a home-run. that completely works.

Okay that’s all for now. More later!